← Back to Blog
Trucking News

Trucking News: June 19, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Trucking News: June 19, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know
```html

Pocketed Demand Keeps Trucking Afloat Amid Uncertain Times

The trucking industry is seeing pockets of demand shouldering the overall economic sluggishness. While some sectors like retail are facing slowdowns, essential goods and regional markets are keeping trucks moving. Trucking Dive reports that geographic disparities are in effect, with certain areas still experiencing capacity constraints.

For smaller carriers, this means your strategy should be flexible. Keep a close eye on regional market trends and adjust your routes to capitalize on high-demand areas. Being tech-savvy is crucial; tools like the VAU0 TMS can help you keep track of these fluctuations and enable dynamic route planning to meet changing demand patterns.

"Those who can move quickly to capitalize on shifting demands will come out ahead, with technology playing a crucial role in identifying and seizing opportunities as they arise."

ATA's "Jackpot Justice" Docuseries Wins Accolades

The American Trucking Associations’ DRIVEN docuseries took home top honors for its episode "Jackpot Justice," which scrutinizes litigation issues in the trucking industry. This award-winning content sheds light on the costly legal battles truckers often face, which can be particularly daunting for small carriers with limited resources.

Understanding these litigation trends is essential for both owner-operators and small carriers. Better compliance can aid in risk mitigation. Focusing on driver training and maintaining documentation can be crucial steps in avoiding legal pitfalls. Implementing compliance solutions, like those offered by VAU0, can bolster your defenses against undeserved legal actions. More details on enhancing compliance efforts can be found on the VAU0 compliance page.

Cassandra Gaines Unveils Blueprint for Better Carrier Selection

Cassandra Gaines has launched a new blueprint aimed at improving the carrier selection process, targeting both shippers and carriers. As reported by FreightWaves, this comprehensive guide provides a structured approach to evaluating carriers, focusing on safety records, operational efficiency, and financial stability.

For carriers, this is a call to hone in on these elements to make yourself more attractive to potential clients. Keeping your safety record spotless and improving operational efficiency are practical steps that will put you ahead. Additionally, showcasing financial stability can reinforce trust and expand opportunities for partnerships.

FMCSA Plans a Wave of Regulatory Changes in 2026

Prepare for upcoming rules from the FMCSA, as hinted by Land Line Media. Expected changes include stricter criteria for ELD compliance and new safety standards. While these changes might seem daunting, they aim to improve safety and reduce accidents on the road, which can help improve public perception and operational standards.

Small carriers should stay informed about these regulatory changes and start adapting early. Investing in up-to-date technology and training for drivers can ease the transition once these rules take effect, minimizing disruptions. VAU0 can be instrumental in keeping track of evolving compliance standards, ensuring you're always ahead of the curve.

Texas DPS Resumes Non-Domiciled CDL Issuances for H-2A Workers

The Texas Department of Public Safety has resumed issuing CDLs to non-domiciled H-2A agricultural workers, offering a larger pool of potential drivers for carriers operating in agricultural logistics. With the expected increase in labor availability, carriers can optimize staffing during peak seasons.

This move is likely to ease some capacity challenges, especially for carriers involved in the agricultural sector. It’s a good opportunity to diversify your workforce by tapping into this labor pool. Consider reviewing and updating your hiring practices to accommodate non-domiciled workers legally and ethically.

What Carriers Should Do This Week

  • Adjust your routes to capitalize on high-demand regional markets using TMS solutions.
  • Enhance your legal preparedness by keeping up with industry litigation trends and compliance standards.
  • Review your carrier proposition in light of Cassandra Gaines' blueprint to attract more business.
  • Prepare for FMCSA's upcoming regulatory changes by investing in newer ELDs and driver training.
  • Explore hiring opportunities with non-domiciled CDL holders, focusing on operational efficiencies.
```
← Back to Blog For Carriers →
Why We Built ESSE Instead of Buying Another TMS | ESSE Blog
Our Story

Why we built ESSE instead of buying another TMS

In 2022, we were running a small fleet and spending approximately $400 per truck per month on software. TMS license, ELD subscription, e-sign service, separate accounting integration. Four different logins. Four different monthly invoices. Four different support teams to call when something didn't work.

None of it talked to each other without manual data entry.

The software evaluation that changed everything

We spent three months evaluating every major TMS and fleet management system on the market. AscendTMS, McLeod, Motive, EZLogz, KeepTruckin, TruckingOffice, Axon. We signed up for demos, trials, and in two cases, paid for actual subscriptions to test them properly.

What we found was consistent across almost all of them: the software was built by people who had never dispatched a truck. You could tell immediately. The terminology was slightly wrong. The workflows assumed steps that no real dispatcher would take. The ELD and TMS were always separate systems that "integrated" — meaning they sometimes shared data, if you configured things correctly, and the configuration broke whenever either vendor pushed an update.

"The best way to evaluate trucking software is to use it under real pressure. Not in a demo. Not in a test environment. On a real load, with a real deadline, when a broker is calling every 30 minutes for an update."

The specific things that were broken

Without naming specific vendors: one major TMS required five screen transitions to update a load status. Not five clicks — five full page navigations. On a mobile browser from a truck stop, that meant 45 seconds to tell a broker the truck was loaded. Another system had beautiful analytics dashboards but couldn't tell you, in real time, how many hours of drive time your driver had remaining without navigating to a separate compliance module.

The ELD market was worse. Most ELD systems were designed to satisfy FMCSA's technical requirements — which they did — while making the user experience as painful as possible. Drivers hated them. When drivers hate their tools, they find workarounds. Workarounds create compliance risk.

The moment we decided to build

The decision was made on a Tuesday afternoon when our dispatcher spent 40 minutes re-entering data from a rate confirmation PDF that our ELD had already captured in a different system. The information existed. It was digital. It lived in three different places that didn't talk to each other, and a human was manually transferring it between systems.

That's not a technology problem. That's a lack of ambition problem. Nobody had decided to solve it because the existing systems were profitable enough without solving it.

What we decided to build instead

One platform. ELD and TMS as the same system, not integrations. AI that reads rate confirmation PDFs so dispatchers don't have to. A dispatcher — eventually an AI dispatcher — that covers nights and weekends so loads don't get missed. E-sign built in, not bolted on.

And priced at zero through 2026, because the goal was to prove the product worked before asking carriers to pay for it.

Two years in: did it work?

The Rate Con AI has a 95%+ accuracy rate on standard broker formats. ERETH ELD passed FMCSA's technical certification. Our AI dispatchers book real loads for real carriers after hours. The carrier dashboard still occasionally has a minor bug — we fix them the same day they're reported.

Would we have been better off just using an existing system and focusing on freight? Financially, in the short term, probably yes. But we would have kept paying $400 per truck per month for software that we knew was mediocre. And we would have missed the opportunity to build something that actually works the way the industry needs it to work.

We don't regret it.

← Back to Blog Next: Our first AI broker call →