← Back to Blog
Trucking News

Trucking News: July 8, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Trucking News: July 8, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know
```html

TCA President Jim Mullen's Impact on the Trucking Industry

Jim Mullen, president of the Truckload Carriers Association (TCA), has been a driving force for change and innovation in the trucking industry. Known for his keen understanding of policy and technological advancements, Mullen has implemented strategies that focus on safety, efficiency, and sustainability. Under his leadership, the TCA has been at the forefront of addressing critical issues like driver retention and regulatory compliance.

For small carriers and owner-operators, Mullen's influence can be seen in the push for better working conditions and advocacy for industry-friendly legislation. His efforts in promoting fair competition and supporting technology integration have aimed to level the playing field, helping smaller operations thrive alongside larger fleets.

Federal Crackdown on Illegal Truck Drivers

Federal agents have intensified efforts to crack down on illegal truck drivers, with a focus on inspections and verifications at weigh stations nationwide. This initiative is part of a broader attempt to ensure highway safety and legitimize trucking operations. Carriers need to be vigilant, ensuring that all drivers hold valid licenses and adhere to existing regulations. Non-compliance could lead to significant fines or even permanent bans from operating commercial vehicles.

For smaller carriers, it is crucial to routinely verify the credentials of all drivers. The crackdown underscores the importance of compliance, both for legal reasons and to avoid operational disruptions. VAU0 LLC can assist carriers in maintaining up-to-date compliance with resources available on our compliance page.

Start-Up Challenges in Competing Against Tesla

A new trucking start-up aiming to compete with Tesla has hit significant roadblocks, with reports of missing paychecks and a lack of physical assets, such as trucks, coming to light. The setbacks highlight the challenges new entrants face in an industry dominated by established players with substantial financial and technological resources.

This situation serves as a cautionary tale for small carriers looking to expand or pivot. Emphasizing operational stability and reliable financial practices is critical to maintaining trust with both employees and clients. Before making ambitious moves, ensuring your business model is robust can prevent similar pitfalls.

Broker Transparency on the Horizon

The long-awaited broker transparency proposal is nearing finalization, promising more clarity in dealings between carriers and brokers. This proposal aims to prevent brokers from concealing key transaction information, ensuring that carriers receive full disclosure of compensation related to freight transportation.

Transparency in broker interactions can be a game-changer for owner-operators and small carriers, providing them the knowledge to negotiate better terms and ensure fair compensation. Staying informed on this development is crucial, and employing a transport management system like the one provided by VAU0 can help integrate these transparency measures more seamlessly.

"The new broker transparency proposal has the potential to significantly alter power dynamics between brokers and small carriers, paving the way for fairer and more equitable engagements." - Industry Analyst

Trucking Rules and 2026 Timelines

Aside from broker transparency, new rules affecting various aspects of trucking are lined up for 2026. These include updates on electronic logging device (ELD) mandates, emission standards, and safety protocols. Understanding these changes is vital for small carriers to avoid penalties and to remain competitive in the industry.

These proposed changes signify a shift towards greater accountability and environmental responsibility. Whether it is upgrading fleets to meet new emission standards or refining operational procedures to comply with safety rules, staying ahead of these mandates is crucial. Leveraging resources like those offered by VAU0 on our transport management system page can support this transition.

What Carriers Should Do This Week

  • Audit driver documents to ensure compliance with federal regulations.
  • Review contracts and interactions with brokers, anticipating new transparency rules.
  • Evaluate financial procedures to ensure stability and preparedness for expansion.
  • Stay informed about upcoming regulatory changes and how they impact your operations.
  • Consider technology solutions to streamline compliance, available through VAU0's services.
```
← Back to Blog For Carriers →
Why We Built ESSE Instead of Buying Another TMS | ESSE Blog
Our Story

Why we built ESSE instead of buying another TMS

In 2022, we were running a small fleet and spending approximately $400 per truck per month on software. TMS license, ELD subscription, e-sign service, separate accounting integration. Four different logins. Four different monthly invoices. Four different support teams to call when something didn't work.

None of it talked to each other without manual data entry.

The software evaluation that changed everything

We spent three months evaluating every major TMS and fleet management system on the market. AscendTMS, McLeod, Motive, EZLogz, KeepTruckin, TruckingOffice, Axon. We signed up for demos, trials, and in two cases, paid for actual subscriptions to test them properly.

What we found was consistent across almost all of them: the software was built by people who had never dispatched a truck. You could tell immediately. The terminology was slightly wrong. The workflows assumed steps that no real dispatcher would take. The ELD and TMS were always separate systems that "integrated" — meaning they sometimes shared data, if you configured things correctly, and the configuration broke whenever either vendor pushed an update.

"The best way to evaluate trucking software is to use it under real pressure. Not in a demo. Not in a test environment. On a real load, with a real deadline, when a broker is calling every 30 minutes for an update."

The specific things that were broken

Without naming specific vendors: one major TMS required five screen transitions to update a load status. Not five clicks — five full page navigations. On a mobile browser from a truck stop, that meant 45 seconds to tell a broker the truck was loaded. Another system had beautiful analytics dashboards but couldn't tell you, in real time, how many hours of drive time your driver had remaining without navigating to a separate compliance module.

The ELD market was worse. Most ELD systems were designed to satisfy FMCSA's technical requirements — which they did — while making the user experience as painful as possible. Drivers hated them. When drivers hate their tools, they find workarounds. Workarounds create compliance risk.

The moment we decided to build

The decision was made on a Tuesday afternoon when our dispatcher spent 40 minutes re-entering data from a rate confirmation PDF that our ELD had already captured in a different system. The information existed. It was digital. It lived in three different places that didn't talk to each other, and a human was manually transferring it between systems.

That's not a technology problem. That's a lack of ambition problem. Nobody had decided to solve it because the existing systems were profitable enough without solving it.

What we decided to build instead

One platform. ELD and TMS as the same system, not integrations. AI that reads rate confirmation PDFs so dispatchers don't have to. A dispatcher — eventually an AI dispatcher — that covers nights and weekends so loads don't get missed. E-sign built in, not bolted on.

And priced at zero through 2026, because the goal was to prove the product worked before asking carriers to pay for it.

Two years in: did it work?

The Rate Con AI has a 95%+ accuracy rate on standard broker formats. ERETH ELD passed FMCSA's technical certification. Our AI dispatchers book real loads for real carriers after hours. The carrier dashboard still occasionally has a minor bug — we fix them the same day they're reported.

Would we have been better off just using an existing system and focusing on freight? Financially, in the short term, probably yes. But we would have kept paying $400 per truck per month for software that we knew was mediocre. And we would have missed the opportunity to build something that actually works the way the industry needs it to work.

We don't regret it.

← Back to Blog Next: Our first AI broker call →