← Back to Blog
Trucking News

Trucking News: September 11, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Trucking News: September 11, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Sparhawk Closure Signals More Pressure on Regional Trucking Markets

Sparhawk is moving to close its trucking business in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, with layoffs already underway, according to the Wausau Pilot & Review. The development is a local story, but it reflects a broader challenge for smaller and midsize carriers: freight demand, operating costs, equipment expenses, and driver costs are not always moving in the same direction.

For owner-operators and small fleets, a competitor’s closure can create both opportunity and risk. Shippers may need replacement capacity, but displaced trucks and drivers can also add competition to already-soft lanes. Carriers should avoid adding equipment based solely on short-term volume. Review customer concentration, renewal dates, deadhead miles, and cash reserves before taking on additional fixed costs. VAU0’s TMS tools can help carriers compare lane performance and identify where available capacity is actually profitable.

Backlash Grows Over DHS Social Media Post Targeting “Mr. Singh”

A Department of Homeland Security post targeting “Mr. Singh” has drawn criticism from California officials and a trucking industry leader, according to CBS News. The response highlights the continuing sensitivity around immigration enforcement, racial profiling, and the large number of immigrant drivers and trucking workers who keep freight moving.

Small carriers should treat this as a reminder that compliance and workplace communication need to be handled carefully. Employers must verify work authorization through the required processes, maintain accurate driver and employment records, and avoid making assumptions based on a worker’s name, accent, appearance, or nationality. Drivers who face an enforcement encounter should remain calm, follow lawful instructions, and know what documents they are required to carry. Carriers should direct complicated immigration or employment questions to qualified legal counsel rather than relying on social media commentary.

The practical lesson for carriers is simple: strong documentation and consistent procedures protect both the business and its drivers when public policy becomes politically charged.

Companies Prepare for National Truck Driver Appreciation Week

Trucking companies and industry organizations are preparing for National Truck Driver Appreciation Week, as reported by Transport Topics. Recognition efforts are expected to include driver events, meals, awards, and public campaigns focused on the role professional drivers play in the supply chain.

For smaller carriers, appreciation does not have to mean an expensive event. A reliable home-time plan, quick maintenance response, accurate pay, and respectful communication often matter more than a one-time gift. Owner-operators can also use the week to thank dispatchers, mechanics, warehouse personnel, and family members who make the work possible.

Carrier owners should make recognition specific. Mention safe miles, strong inspection results, customer service, mentoring, or the willingness to cover difficult freight. If a bonus or gift card is planned, communicate the eligibility rules clearly and pay it on time. Retention efforts work best when appreciation continues after the campaign ends.

DOT Automated Vehicle Strategy Could Shape the Next Equipment Cycle

The Department of Transportation’s automated vehicle strategy could influence how autonomous and driver-assistance systems are tested, regulated, and introduced into trucking, according to TruckingInfo. The strategy is part of a larger debate over safety standards, federal and state authority, operational responsibility, and how automated systems will interact with conventional trucks.

This is not an immediate signal for small carriers to replace their fleets with autonomous equipment. Most owner-operators will continue to rely on conventional trucks for the foreseeable future, and the business case for new technology still depends on price, insurance, maintenance, infrastructure, and customer requirements. However, carriers should pay attention to equipment specifications and avoid signing long-term agreements without understanding what data systems, software updates, and service support are included.

Automation may arrive first through features such as collision mitigation, lane-departure warnings, adaptive cruise control, camera systems, and driver monitoring. These tools can support safety, but they do not remove the driver’s responsibility to operate attentively. Train drivers on system limitations and document that training. A technology policy should also explain when drivers must report alerts, malfunctions, or unexpected system behavior.

FMCSA Emergency CDL School Closures Create Training Disruptions

FMCSA has ordered emergency closures involving commercial driver’s license training schools, with Overdrive publishing a list of the schools affected. The action creates immediate uncertainty for students who have paid tuition, started behind-the-wheel training, or planned to test through one of the listed providers.

Carriers that recruit entry-level drivers should verify the status of a training provider before sending applicants there or reimbursing tuition. A school’s closure can delay licensing, disrupt hiring plans, and leave a carrier responsible for helping a candidate find another approved program. Keep copies of enrollment records, payment receipts, training completion documents, and any communication from the school.

Fleet managers should also review their recruiting materials and qualification process. Do not assume that a student’s paperwork is sufficient simply because the driver attended a commercial school. Confirm that the driver completed the required training through an eligible provider and that the licensing record is valid. Carriers can use VAU0’s compliance resources to organize recurring reviews of driver files, training records, and qualification documents.

What carriers should do this week

  • Review every major customer and lane for margin, deadhead, payment timing, and concentration risk before adding trucks or accepting replacement freight.
  • Verify the status of CDL schools used by recruits, and preserve enrollment and training records for every driver in the hiring pipeline.
  • Update driver-file and workplace policies covering document retention, respectful communication, enforcement encounters, and escalation to qualified legal counsel.
  • Recognize drivers with specific, timely appreciation—and review pay accuracy, home time, maintenance response, and dispatch communication while doing it.
  • Audit onboard safety technology and train drivers on the limits of automated features rather than treating them as substitutes for attentive driving.
← Back to Blog For Carriers →
Why We Built ESSE Instead of Buying Another TMS | ESSE Blog
Our Story

Why we built ESSE instead of buying another TMS

In 2022, we were running a small fleet and spending approximately $400 per truck per month on software. TMS license, ELD subscription, e-sign service, separate accounting integration. Four different logins. Four different monthly invoices. Four different support teams to call when something didn't work.

None of it talked to each other without manual data entry.

The software evaluation that changed everything

We spent three months evaluating every major TMS and fleet management system on the market. AscendTMS, McLeod, Motive, EZLogz, KeepTruckin, TruckingOffice, Axon. We signed up for demos, trials, and in two cases, paid for actual subscriptions to test them properly.

What we found was consistent across almost all of them: the software was built by people who had never dispatched a truck. You could tell immediately. The terminology was slightly wrong. The workflows assumed steps that no real dispatcher would take. The ELD and TMS were always separate systems that "integrated" — meaning they sometimes shared data, if you configured things correctly, and the configuration broke whenever either vendor pushed an update.

"The best way to evaluate trucking software is to use it under real pressure. Not in a demo. Not in a test environment. On a real load, with a real deadline, when a broker is calling every 30 minutes for an update."

The specific things that were broken

Without naming specific vendors: one major TMS required five screen transitions to update a load status. Not five clicks — five full page navigations. On a mobile browser from a truck stop, that meant 45 seconds to tell a broker the truck was loaded. Another system had beautiful analytics dashboards but couldn't tell you, in real time, how many hours of drive time your driver had remaining without navigating to a separate compliance module.

The ELD market was worse. Most ELD systems were designed to satisfy FMCSA's technical requirements — which they did — while making the user experience as painful as possible. Drivers hated them. When drivers hate their tools, they find workarounds. Workarounds create compliance risk.

The moment we decided to build

The decision was made on a Tuesday afternoon when our dispatcher spent 40 minutes re-entering data from a rate confirmation PDF that our ELD had already captured in a different system. The information existed. It was digital. It lived in three different places that didn't talk to each other, and a human was manually transferring it between systems.

That's not a technology problem. That's a lack of ambition problem. Nobody had decided to solve it because the existing systems were profitable enough without solving it.

What we decided to build instead

One platform. ELD and TMS as the same system, not integrations. AI that reads rate confirmation PDFs so dispatchers don't have to. A dispatcher — eventually an AI dispatcher — that covers nights and weekends so loads don't get missed. E-sign built in, not bolted on.

And priced at zero through 2026, because the goal was to prove the product worked before asking carriers to pay for it.

Two years in: did it work?

The Rate Con AI has a 95%+ accuracy rate on standard broker formats. ERETH ELD passed FMCSA's technical certification. Our AI dispatchers book real loads for real carriers after hours. The carrier dashboard still occasionally has a minor bug — we fix them the same day they're reported.

Would we have been better off just using an existing system and focusing on freight? Financially, in the short term, probably yes. But we would have kept paying $400 per truck per month for software that we knew was mediocre. And we would have missed the opportunity to build something that actually works the way the industry needs it to work.

We don't regret it.

← Back to Blog Next: Our first AI broker call →