← Back to Blog
Trucking News

Trucking News: September 12, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Trucking News: September 12, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Trucks Remain Critical to the Rhode Island Economy

A letter published in The Providence Journal makes a point that applies well beyond Rhode Island: trucking is part of the economic infrastructure that keeps every other industry moving. Construction, manufacturing, retail, food distribution, health care, and entertainment all depend on trucks arriving when promised. Even industries that receive more public attention, such as film production, rely on freight carriers to move equipment, supplies, sets, and crews.

For small carriers, that visibility matters. A carrier may not receive credit when a project stays on schedule, but a missed delivery can immediately become a business problem for the customer. This is a useful reminder to document service quality, communicate early when delays develop, and present your company as a business partner rather than simply a provider of miles. Tools that consolidate dispatch, customer updates, and proof of delivery—such as a properly configured transportation management system—can help a small operation demonstrate that value.

High Diesel Prices Keep the Focus on Tesla and Electric Trucks

MarketWatch examines how Tesla could reshape trucking while benefiting from persistently high diesel prices. The basic business case is familiar: fuel is one of the largest variable costs for a carrier, and a truck that uses less energy could create meaningful savings over time. Tesla also brings experience with batteries, software, charging management, and over-the-air updates that could influence how fleets evaluate electric equipment.

That does not mean electric trucks are an immediate fit for every owner-operator. Purchase price, payload, charging access, route length, winter performance, battery degradation, and downtime all matter. Regional and dedicated operations with predictable daily mileage may have a clearer path than irregular long-haul work. Small carriers should watch total operating cost rather than headline fuel savings, including financing, insurance, maintenance, charging infrastructure, and replacement-cycle assumptions. A practical first step is to track fuel, idle time, maintenance, and utilization by truck so any future equipment decision is based on your own numbers.

The most important question is not whether one technology wins the trucking market; it is whether a carrier can match the right powertrain to the right route without putting cash flow at risk.

Industry Prepares for National Truck Driver Appreciation Week

Trucking companies and industry groups are preparing for National Truck Driver Appreciation Week, according to Transport Topics. Recognition events can seem routine, but they arrive during a period when drivers are dealing with tight appointment windows, parking shortages, elevated operating costs, and more administrative demands. A sincere effort to recognize drivers is also an opportunity to address the conditions that affect retention.

For small carriers, appreciation does not have to mean an expensive event. Clear communication, reliable home-time planning, clean equipment, prompt payroll, and respect at shipper and receiver locations often matter more than a one-time gift. Carrier owners can use the week to ask drivers what creates the most friction in daily operations, then fix one or two recurring problems. If you are recruiting, specific answers about detention handling, maintenance response, and dispatch expectations are more credible than general promises.

DOT Automated Vehicle Strategy Could Shape Trucking’s Next Phase

Heavy Duty Trucking reports on what the Department of Transportation’s automated vehicle strategy could mean for trucking. Federal policy will influence testing, safety expectations, data collection, cybersecurity, and the relationship between federal and state rules. Automation is likely to arrive in stages, including driver-assistance systems, automated functions in controlled environments, and eventually more advanced highway applications.

Small carriers should treat this as a planning issue, not a reason to make a rushed purchase. Advanced safety systems can reduce certain risks, but they do not replace driver training, preventive maintenance, cargo securement, or management oversight. Carriers should ask equipment vendors what data a system collects, who owns that data, how software updates are handled, and what happens when a sensor or camera fails. Keeping inspection and maintenance records organized through a compliance program will become even more important as electronic systems play a larger role in crash investigations and insurance reviews.

Challenges May Be Coming to the Non-Domiciled CDL Rule

Trucknews.com reports that court challenges are approaching over FMCSA’s rule concerning non-domiciled commercial driver’s licenses. The issue has significant consequences for carriers that employ drivers whose licensing or residency status falls under the rule. Litigation could affect implementation timelines, enforcement expectations, or the details of what state licensing agencies and carriers must verify.

Until the legal picture is settled, carriers should avoid relying on social media summaries or informal interpretations. Review the rule and any updates from FMCSA, state driver licensing agencies, and qualified counsel. Audit the records for affected drivers, including license status, expiration dates, medical certification, employment documentation, and the information your company used during onboarding. Do not make assumptions about a driver’s eligibility based solely on nationality, accent, or where the driver lives; use the applicable documentation and official requirements.

This is also a good time to tighten hiring controls generally. A consistent checklist, documented verification, and a clear process for placing a driver on hold when information is incomplete can prevent a small carrier from turning a regulatory question into an out-of-service event or insurance problem. VAU0’s compliance resources can help carriers organize these recurring checks, but any rule-specific legal decision should be confirmed with a qualified professional.

What carriers should do this week

  • Review fuel, maintenance, idle, and utilization data for each truck before considering an electric or alternative-fuel purchase.
  • Ask drivers for one operational problem that management can fix, and follow through during National Truck Driver Appreciation Week.
  • Check that driver qualification, medical certification, license, and onboarding records are current—especially for drivers affected by the non-domiciled CDL rule.
  • Confirm that advanced safety or telematics systems are supported by written maintenance, training, and data-retention procedures.
  • Use your TMS and compliance workflow to document dispatch decisions, delivery performance, inspections, and customer communication.
← Back to Blog For Carriers →
Why We Built ESSE Instead of Buying Another TMS | ESSE Blog
Our Story

Why we built ESSE instead of buying another TMS

In 2022, we were running a small fleet and spending approximately $400 per truck per month on software. TMS license, ELD subscription, e-sign service, separate accounting integration. Four different logins. Four different monthly invoices. Four different support teams to call when something didn't work.

None of it talked to each other without manual data entry.

The software evaluation that changed everything

We spent three months evaluating every major TMS and fleet management system on the market. AscendTMS, McLeod, Motive, EZLogz, KeepTruckin, TruckingOffice, Axon. We signed up for demos, trials, and in two cases, paid for actual subscriptions to test them properly.

What we found was consistent across almost all of them: the software was built by people who had never dispatched a truck. You could tell immediately. The terminology was slightly wrong. The workflows assumed steps that no real dispatcher would take. The ELD and TMS were always separate systems that "integrated" — meaning they sometimes shared data, if you configured things correctly, and the configuration broke whenever either vendor pushed an update.

"The best way to evaluate trucking software is to use it under real pressure. Not in a demo. Not in a test environment. On a real load, with a real deadline, when a broker is calling every 30 minutes for an update."

The specific things that were broken

Without naming specific vendors: one major TMS required five screen transitions to update a load status. Not five clicks — five full page navigations. On a mobile browser from a truck stop, that meant 45 seconds to tell a broker the truck was loaded. Another system had beautiful analytics dashboards but couldn't tell you, in real time, how many hours of drive time your driver had remaining without navigating to a separate compliance module.

The ELD market was worse. Most ELD systems were designed to satisfy FMCSA's technical requirements — which they did — while making the user experience as painful as possible. Drivers hated them. When drivers hate their tools, they find workarounds. Workarounds create compliance risk.

The moment we decided to build

The decision was made on a Tuesday afternoon when our dispatcher spent 40 minutes re-entering data from a rate confirmation PDF that our ELD had already captured in a different system. The information existed. It was digital. It lived in three different places that didn't talk to each other, and a human was manually transferring it between systems.

That's not a technology problem. That's a lack of ambition problem. Nobody had decided to solve it because the existing systems were profitable enough without solving it.

What we decided to build instead

One platform. ELD and TMS as the same system, not integrations. AI that reads rate confirmation PDFs so dispatchers don't have to. A dispatcher — eventually an AI dispatcher — that covers nights and weekends so loads don't get missed. E-sign built in, not bolted on.

And priced at zero through 2026, because the goal was to prove the product worked before asking carriers to pay for it.

Two years in: did it work?

The Rate Con AI has a 95%+ accuracy rate on standard broker formats. ERETH ELD passed FMCSA's technical certification. Our AI dispatchers book real loads for real carriers after hours. The carrier dashboard still occasionally has a minor bug — we fix them the same day they're reported.

Would we have been better off just using an existing system and focusing on freight? Financially, in the short term, probably yes. But we would have kept paying $400 per truck per month for software that we knew was mediocre. And we would have missed the opportunity to build something that actually works the way the industry needs it to work.

We don't regret it.

← Back to Blog Next: Our first AI broker call →