← Back to Blog
Trucking News

Trucking News: September 21, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Trucking News: September 21, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Diesel Costs Are Pressuring Minnesota Trucking Operations

High diesel prices are taking a direct toll on Minnesota’s trucking industry, according to reporting from MPR News. For small carriers, the problem is not limited to the price displayed at the pump. Fuel affects every loaded mile, every deadhead move, and every week when a truck runs below capacity.

Owner-operators typically feel the squeeze first because fuel is one of their largest variable expenses. A truck can remain busy while producing little cash flow if rates do not adjust with fuel costs. Carriers should be reviewing fuel surcharge schedules, lane profitability, and dispatch decisions instead of assuming that higher gross revenue means higher profit.

Regional carriers may have some flexibility through shorter routes, fuel networks, and stronger customer relationships. However, a surcharge that has not been updated recently can leave a carrier absorbing much of the increase. A simple weekly comparison of fuel cost per mile against revenue per loaded mile can show which customers or lanes need attention.

Record Diesel Prices Squeeze Operators Across the Northwest

KGW and Local 3 News are reporting that record diesel prices are squeezing trucking companies in the Northwest. The two reports point to the same broader issue: fuel inflation is arriving while carriers are already managing equipment payments, insurance, maintenance, and uneven freight demand.

Small fleets often have less negotiating power than large carriers, making it harder to immediately pass higher operating costs to customers. Some operators may be tempted to accept marginal freight simply to keep the truck moving. That can be dangerous when the load does not cover fuel, tolls, maintenance reserves, and driver compensation.

Fuel planning should be treated as a pricing function, not just a purchasing task. Dispatchers and owners should compare route options, identify reliable discount locations, and avoid unnecessary repositioning. A transportation management system can help track expected fuel expense and margin by load. VAU0’s TMS tools can support that kind of load and operating-cost review.

When diesel rises this quickly, the question is not simply whether a truck is busy. The question is whether each load still pays for the miles required to move it.

FMCSA’s Non-Domiciled CDL Rule Faces Court Challenges

Overdrive reports that FMCSA’s restriction involving non-domiciled commercial driver’s licenses is facing significant trouble in court. The case creates uncertainty for carriers that employ drivers holding these credentials, as well as for drivers, recruiters, and state licensing agencies trying to determine what requirements will remain in effect.

The practical concern for small carriers is disruption. A driver’s eligibility, licensing status, or ability to renew credentials can affect dispatch plans, insurance files, customer commitments, and available capacity. Even when a court challenge is pending, carriers should not assume that enforcement requirements have disappeared. Court orders, agency guidance, and state implementation decisions can change quickly.

Carriers should maintain a complete qualification file for every driver and document license checks, endorsements, medical certification, and employment eligibility records. Avoid making hiring or termination decisions based on headlines alone. The safest approach is to verify the current rule with official FMCSA and state sources, then review the company’s compliance process with qualified counsel. VAU0’s compliance resources can help organize recurring reviews and driver documentation.

CVSA Regulatory Update Highlights the Need for Ongoing Monitoring

CVSA’s September regulatory update is a reminder that trucking compliance does not stop after an annual review. Regulatory changes, enforcement guidance, inspection priorities, and implementation timelines can affect drivers and carriers even when no single rule produces immediate headlines.

For a small fleet, the challenge is keeping up without a dedicated compliance department. A rule may involve vehicle maintenance, driver qualification, cargo securement, inspections, or state-level enforcement. Missing a change can lead to preventable violations, out-of-service events, or customer concerns about the carrier’s safety record.

Owners should assign responsibility for monitoring regulatory updates and keep a written record of what was reviewed and what changed. Drivers also need concise communication: what the rule means, what documents they must carry, and what inspection issue they need to avoid. A short toolbox talk is often more effective than forwarding a long regulatory bulletin without explanation.

What Today’s Fuel and Regulatory News Means for Small Carriers

These stories reinforce two different but connected risks. Fuel prices can damage margins immediately, while regulatory uncertainty can create capacity and compliance problems over time. Both require active management rather than waiting for market conditions to improve.

Carriers should also be careful about relying on old assumptions. A fuel surcharge formula that worked last year may not reflect current costs. A driver file that passed a previous review may need additional verification if licensing requirements change. Strong recordkeeping and frequent financial review are practical protections for companies operating with limited cash reserves.

  • Recalculate fuel cost per mile and review every lane, customer, and surcharge agreement that may no longer cover operating costs.
  • Use fuel-card data, route planning, and dispatch reports to reduce unnecessary deadhead miles and identify the most economical fueling locations.
  • Audit driver qualification files, CDL status, medical cards, endorsements, and related documentation before assigning future loads.
  • Monitor official FMCSA, state, and CVSA updates; document each review and brief drivers on any change that affects inspections or dispatch.
  • Protect cash flow by reserving funds for fuel, maintenance, insurance, and taxes before treating a strong revenue week as profit.
← Back to Blog For Carriers →
Why We Built ESSE Instead of Buying Another TMS | ESSE Blog
Our Story

Why we built ESSE instead of buying another TMS

In 2022, we were running a small fleet and spending approximately $400 per truck per month on software. TMS license, ELD subscription, e-sign service, separate accounting integration. Four different logins. Four different monthly invoices. Four different support teams to call when something didn't work.

None of it talked to each other without manual data entry.

The software evaluation that changed everything

We spent three months evaluating every major TMS and fleet management system on the market. AscendTMS, McLeod, Motive, EZLogz, KeepTruckin, TruckingOffice, Axon. We signed up for demos, trials, and in two cases, paid for actual subscriptions to test them properly.

What we found was consistent across almost all of them: the software was built by people who had never dispatched a truck. You could tell immediately. The terminology was slightly wrong. The workflows assumed steps that no real dispatcher would take. The ELD and TMS were always separate systems that "integrated" — meaning they sometimes shared data, if you configured things correctly, and the configuration broke whenever either vendor pushed an update.

"The best way to evaluate trucking software is to use it under real pressure. Not in a demo. Not in a test environment. On a real load, with a real deadline, when a broker is calling every 30 minutes for an update."

The specific things that were broken

Without naming specific vendors: one major TMS required five screen transitions to update a load status. Not five clicks — five full page navigations. On a mobile browser from a truck stop, that meant 45 seconds to tell a broker the truck was loaded. Another system had beautiful analytics dashboards but couldn't tell you, in real time, how many hours of drive time your driver had remaining without navigating to a separate compliance module.

The ELD market was worse. Most ELD systems were designed to satisfy FMCSA's technical requirements — which they did — while making the user experience as painful as possible. Drivers hated them. When drivers hate their tools, they find workarounds. Workarounds create compliance risk.

The moment we decided to build

The decision was made on a Tuesday afternoon when our dispatcher spent 40 minutes re-entering data from a rate confirmation PDF that our ELD had already captured in a different system. The information existed. It was digital. It lived in three different places that didn't talk to each other, and a human was manually transferring it between systems.

That's not a technology problem. That's a lack of ambition problem. Nobody had decided to solve it because the existing systems were profitable enough without solving it.

What we decided to build instead

One platform. ELD and TMS as the same system, not integrations. AI that reads rate confirmation PDFs so dispatchers don't have to. A dispatcher — eventually an AI dispatcher — that covers nights and weekends so loads don't get missed. E-sign built in, not bolted on.

And priced at zero through 2026, because the goal was to prove the product worked before asking carriers to pay for it.

Two years in: did it work?

The Rate Con AI has a 95%+ accuracy rate on standard broker formats. ERETH ELD passed FMCSA's technical certification. Our AI dispatchers book real loads for real carriers after hours. The carrier dashboard still occasionally has a minor bug — we fix them the same day they're reported.

Would we have been better off just using an existing system and focusing on freight? Financially, in the short term, probably yes. But we would have kept paying $400 per truck per month for software that we knew was mediocre. And we would have missed the opportunity to build something that actually works the way the industry needs it to work.

We don't regret it.

← Back to Blog Next: Our first AI broker call →