← Back to Blog
Trucking News

Trucking News: September 29, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Trucking News: September 29, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

CDL Schools Have a Front-Line Role in Fighting Human Trafficking

CDL schools are increasingly being viewed as an important point of contact in the fight against human trafficking. In a conversation with Truckers Against Trafficking (TAT), industry representatives emphasized that instructors can help students recognize warning signs before they begin driving professionally. That includes identifying coercion, unusual control over another person, restricted movement, and situations involving minors or vulnerable adults.

For small carriers, this is more than a social-responsibility issue. Drivers may encounter trafficking activity at truck stops, rest areas, warehouses, and roadside businesses. Owners should make sure new hires receive practical awareness training and understand how to report suspicious activity without confronting anyone. TAT resources can supplement onboarding, while a carrier’s safety program and compliance procedures should clearly document the training.

Executive Pushes Back on Nationwide Strike Rumors

Rumors of a nationwide trucker strike are circulating again, but one trucking executive is pushing back on the idea that a coordinated shutdown is imminent. Frustration remains widespread over fuel costs, insurance, broker practices, regulatory pressure, and weak or inconsistent rates. Still, online claims about a national strike can move faster than verified information and create unnecessary uncertainty for shippers and drivers.

Small carriers should avoid making dispatch or equipment decisions based solely on social media posts. Verify any operational disruption through reliable industry sources, direct customer communication, and state or facility notices. If a major customer is concerned about service continuity, use your TMS to review available capacity, alternate routes, appointment schedules, and open loads. A written contingency plan is more useful than reacting to rumors after freight has already been delayed.

The most important takeaway today: carriers need documented, verifiable operating plans—not rumor-driven decisions—to manage regulatory, labor, and market uncertainty.

Family-Owned Carriers Accuse Major Brokers of Favoring “Chameleon” Carriers

Six family-owned trucking companies are accusing C.H. Robinson and TQL of working with so-called chameleon carriers and pricing compliant operators out of freight. The allegations involve carriers that allegedly change identity, ownership, or operating details after safety or business problems, making it harder for brokers and shippers to distinguish legitimate companies from bad actors. The companies named in the report have not been found liable simply because allegations were made, and the dispute remains an industry and legal matter.

The broader concern is familiar to small fleets: a compliant carrier can spend heavily on insurance, maintenance, drug and alcohol testing, technology, and qualified personnel, only to compete against an operator with lower costs achieved by avoiding those obligations. Carriers should protect themselves by keeping a complete audit trail of authority, insurance, inspections, signed rate confirmations, shipper instructions, and broker communications. Strong documentation in a transportation management system can help support claims and identify repeated problems with a customer or intermediary.

Broker vetting also matters. Before accepting a load, confirm the broker’s identity, payment terms, cargo requirements, and contact details through trusted records. Do not rely on a rate that looks unusually high or on an email address that does not match the broker’s established business information.

Truckers Support Stronger Enforcement of English-Proficiency Rules

Truckers are applauding the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s proposal to give more force to English-proficiency requirements. The issue is not about accent or cultural background. It is about whether a commercial driver can understand signs, communicate with law enforcement and inspectors, complete required records, and respond to safety instructions during an emergency.

For small carriers, enforcement could create both safety benefits and hiring challenges. Owners should not wait for a roadside inspection to discover that a driver cannot handle basic operational communication. Hiring procedures should include a job-related language assessment using realistic tasks, such as reading a shipping document, explaining a medical or mechanical issue, and responding to an inspection question. Apply the same standard consistently, document the result, and provide coaching where appropriate. Review your driver qualification and training records through your compliance program.

Marijuana Rescheduling Does Not Remove DOT Employer Duties

Discussion about possible marijuana rescheduling is creating confusion among transportation employers. A change in federal drug classification would not automatically make marijuana acceptable for safety-sensitive commercial driving positions. DOT drug and alcohol testing rules, including marijuana testing requirements, remain the controlling standard for covered drivers unless DOT formally changes those rules.

That distinction is critical for owner-operators and small fleets. State legalization or a medical-marijuana authorization does not excuse a positive result under the federal transportation testing program. Employers should continue using qualified testing providers, following required random-testing procedures, and removing drivers from safety-sensitive duties when a violation requires it. Policies should also address impairment, possession, and company equipment without promising protections that federal rules do not provide.

Review handbook language and supervisor training before making any policy change. Keep testing, return-to-duty, and substance-abuse-professional records organized and restricted to authorized personnel. VAU0’s compliance resources can help carriers keep their operating procedures aligned while the rescheduling debate develops.

What carriers should do this week

  • Add human-trafficking awareness to driver orientation and annual safety training, using recognized industry resources.
  • Tell dispatchers and drivers to verify strike or shutdown reports before changing routes, refusing freight, or notifying customers.
  • Audit broker and carrier records for identity changes, inconsistent insurance information, unusual email domains, and suspicious payment instructions.
  • Review English-proficiency screening and document job-related communication skills for every driver consistently.
  • Keep DOT marijuana-testing policies unchanged unless an official federal rule specifically changes employer requirements.
← Back to Blog For Carriers →
Why We Built ESSE Instead of Buying Another TMS | ESSE Blog
Our Story

Why we built ESSE instead of buying another TMS

In 2022, we were running a small fleet and spending approximately $400 per truck per month on software. TMS license, ELD subscription, e-sign service, separate accounting integration. Four different logins. Four different monthly invoices. Four different support teams to call when something didn't work.

None of it talked to each other without manual data entry.

The software evaluation that changed everything

We spent three months evaluating every major TMS and fleet management system on the market. AscendTMS, McLeod, Motive, EZLogz, KeepTruckin, TruckingOffice, Axon. We signed up for demos, trials, and in two cases, paid for actual subscriptions to test them properly.

What we found was consistent across almost all of them: the software was built by people who had never dispatched a truck. You could tell immediately. The terminology was slightly wrong. The workflows assumed steps that no real dispatcher would take. The ELD and TMS were always separate systems that "integrated" — meaning they sometimes shared data, if you configured things correctly, and the configuration broke whenever either vendor pushed an update.

"The best way to evaluate trucking software is to use it under real pressure. Not in a demo. Not in a test environment. On a real load, with a real deadline, when a broker is calling every 30 minutes for an update."

The specific things that were broken

Without naming specific vendors: one major TMS required five screen transitions to update a load status. Not five clicks — five full page navigations. On a mobile browser from a truck stop, that meant 45 seconds to tell a broker the truck was loaded. Another system had beautiful analytics dashboards but couldn't tell you, in real time, how many hours of drive time your driver had remaining without navigating to a separate compliance module.

The ELD market was worse. Most ELD systems were designed to satisfy FMCSA's technical requirements — which they did — while making the user experience as painful as possible. Drivers hated them. When drivers hate their tools, they find workarounds. Workarounds create compliance risk.

The moment we decided to build

The decision was made on a Tuesday afternoon when our dispatcher spent 40 minutes re-entering data from a rate confirmation PDF that our ELD had already captured in a different system. The information existed. It was digital. It lived in three different places that didn't talk to each other, and a human was manually transferring it between systems.

That's not a technology problem. That's a lack of ambition problem. Nobody had decided to solve it because the existing systems were profitable enough without solving it.

What we decided to build instead

One platform. ELD and TMS as the same system, not integrations. AI that reads rate confirmation PDFs so dispatchers don't have to. A dispatcher — eventually an AI dispatcher — that covers nights and weekends so loads don't get missed. E-sign built in, not bolted on.

And priced at zero through 2026, because the goal was to prove the product worked before asking carriers to pay for it.

Two years in: did it work?

The Rate Con AI has a 95%+ accuracy rate on standard broker formats. ERETH ELD passed FMCSA's technical certification. Our AI dispatchers book real loads for real carriers after hours. The carrier dashboard still occasionally has a minor bug — we fix them the same day they're reported.

Would we have been better off just using an existing system and focusing on freight? Financially, in the short term, probably yes. But we would have kept paying $400 per truck per month for software that we knew was mediocre. And we would have missed the opportunity to build something that actually works the way the industry needs it to work.

We don't regret it.

← Back to Blog Next: Our first AI broker call →