← Back to Blog
Trucking News

Trucking News: October 7, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Trucking News: October 7, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Diesel Nears $8 in Los Angeles, Putting Immediate Pressure on Small Carriers

Los Angeles truckers are dealing with diesel prices approaching $8 per gallon, according to the Los Angeles Times. For carriers operating in Southern California, this is not an abstract market headline. It directly affects every local delivery, drayage move, and regional run leaving the ports or Inland Empire.

Fuel surcharges may help, but they rarely protect a carrier immediately. Surcharges are often based on older index prices, calculated with a delay, or limited by shipper and broker agreements. Owner-operators should review whether the surcharge actually covers current fuel expense, deadhead, idling, and congestion. A truck averaging 6.5 miles per gallon at $8 diesel spends roughly 12 cents per mile on fuel for every dollar increase above a $7 baseline.

The practical lesson is simple: when fuel moves this fast, a carrier cannot manage profitability by looking only at the line-haul rate.

Small fleets should calculate their true fuel cost by lane and update operating budgets weekly. That information supports better rate negotiations and helps identify freight that should be rejected. VAU0 can help carriers organize rate, fuel, and trip data through its transportation management tools, giving dispatchers a clearer view of which loads are actually profitable.

ATA Roundtable Highlights Trucking’s Push for More Federal Attention

The American Trucking Associations’ chairman hosted Congressman Hern for a trucking roundtable in Oklahoma. Meetings like this give carriers a chance to raise operational concerns directly with lawmakers, including workforce challenges, highway funding, regulatory timelines, and the cost of running equipment.

For small carriers, the value of these discussions depends on whether policy conversations reach the realities of the road. Large fleets may have compliance departments and government-relations staff, while an owner-operator may be handling dispatch, maintenance, payroll, and safety paperwork alone. Issues such as detention, insurance costs, parking shortages, and inconsistent enforcement need to remain part of the conversation.

Carriers can make their concerns more useful by documenting specific examples instead of relying only on general complaints. Keep records of unpaid detention, repeated inspection problems, excessive wait times, and the cost of regulatory changes. Clear operating data gives trade groups and elected officials something concrete to present when trucking policy is debated.

2027 Trucking Conferences Give Carriers a Planning Opportunity

Trucking Dive has published a look at major trucking conferences and events planned for 2027. While these events are still months away, early planning matters for carriers that want to use conferences for more than collecting brochures. The strongest value usually comes from targeted meetings with technology providers, equipment vendors, brokers, lenders, and safety professionals.

Small carriers should select events based on a specific business goal. A regional carrier focused on reducing maintenance costs may benefit more from an equipment or fleet-management event than from a broad national gathering. An owner-operator considering expansion should prioritize sessions on insurance, financing, recruiting, compliance, and back-office systems.

Before registering, build a short list of questions and calculate the full cost of attendance, including travel, lodging, and missed revenue. Ask vendors for implementation costs and contract terms, not just product demonstrations. A conference can be worthwhile when it produces one measurable improvement, such as lower empty miles or faster invoicing, but it can also become an expensive distraction without a plan.

FMCSA Finalizes Emergency Relief Rule

Land Line Media reports that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration has finalized an emergency relief rule. Emergency rules can provide temporary flexibility during unusual conditions, but they also create compliance risks when carriers assume the relief is broader than it actually is.

Carriers should read the final rule rather than relying on social media summaries or informal advice. Pay attention to the effective date, expiration date, geographic limits, covered commodities, documentation requirements, and any provisions that remain unchanged. Relief from one requirement does not automatically waive hours-of-service, vehicle inspection, drug and alcohol, insurance, or other safety obligations.

Dispatchers should keep a copy of the applicable rule and record why a qualifying trip used emergency relief. Drivers need clear instructions before accepting a load under the exemption. For a small fleet, a short compliance checklist can prevent a roadside explanation from turning into a violation. VAU0’s compliance resources can help organize the records and reminders that support this process.

FMCSA’s 2026 Regulatory Agenda Keeps Several Changes in View

FleetOwner’s review of FMCSA’s 2026 regulatory agenda outlines trucking rules that carriers should continue watching. An agenda is not the same as a final rule, and publication dates can change. Still, it provides an early warning that future requirements may affect safety systems, driver qualification, equipment, reporting, or enforcement procedures.

The right response is preparation, not panic. Carriers should avoid purchasing equipment or rewriting policies based only on a proposed rule. Instead, identify which parts of the operation would be affected and estimate the likely cost of compliance. That may include additional training, software changes, recordkeeping, vehicle upgrades, or more administrative time.

Owner-operators should also make sure their email, mailing address, and compliance contacts are current so important notices are not missed. Carrier owners can assign someone to review FMCSA updates monthly and summarize only the items that require action. Keeping policies, driver files, maintenance records, and inspection documentation organized now will make future changes easier to absorb.

What carriers should do this week

  • Recalculate fuel cost per mile using current prices and compare it with every active fuel-surcharge agreement.
  • Review high-mileage and high-deadhead lanes; renegotiate, re-route, or reject freight that no longer covers its operating cost.
  • Read the final FMCSA emergency relief rule and document eligibility, dates, geography, and required records before dispatching qualifying loads.
  • Assign one person to monitor the 2026 regulatory agenda and keep driver, maintenance, and compliance files current.
  • Choose one 2027 conference or industry event tied to a measurable business goal, then budget for it early.
← Back to Blog For Carriers →
Why We Built ESSE Instead of Buying Another TMS | ESSE Blog
Our Story

Why we built ESSE instead of buying another TMS

In 2022, we were running a small fleet and spending approximately $400 per truck per month on software. TMS license, ELD subscription, e-sign service, separate accounting integration. Four different logins. Four different monthly invoices. Four different support teams to call when something didn't work.

None of it talked to each other without manual data entry.

The software evaluation that changed everything

We spent three months evaluating every major TMS and fleet management system on the market. AscendTMS, McLeod, Motive, EZLogz, KeepTruckin, TruckingOffice, Axon. We signed up for demos, trials, and in two cases, paid for actual subscriptions to test them properly.

What we found was consistent across almost all of them: the software was built by people who had never dispatched a truck. You could tell immediately. The terminology was slightly wrong. The workflows assumed steps that no real dispatcher would take. The ELD and TMS were always separate systems that "integrated" — meaning they sometimes shared data, if you configured things correctly, and the configuration broke whenever either vendor pushed an update.

"The best way to evaluate trucking software is to use it under real pressure. Not in a demo. Not in a test environment. On a real load, with a real deadline, when a broker is calling every 30 minutes for an update."

The specific things that were broken

Without naming specific vendors: one major TMS required five screen transitions to update a load status. Not five clicks — five full page navigations. On a mobile browser from a truck stop, that meant 45 seconds to tell a broker the truck was loaded. Another system had beautiful analytics dashboards but couldn't tell you, in real time, how many hours of drive time your driver had remaining without navigating to a separate compliance module.

The ELD market was worse. Most ELD systems were designed to satisfy FMCSA's technical requirements — which they did — while making the user experience as painful as possible. Drivers hated them. When drivers hate their tools, they find workarounds. Workarounds create compliance risk.

The moment we decided to build

The decision was made on a Tuesday afternoon when our dispatcher spent 40 minutes re-entering data from a rate confirmation PDF that our ELD had already captured in a different system. The information existed. It was digital. It lived in three different places that didn't talk to each other, and a human was manually transferring it between systems.

That's not a technology problem. That's a lack of ambition problem. Nobody had decided to solve it because the existing systems were profitable enough without solving it.

What we decided to build instead

One platform. ELD and TMS as the same system, not integrations. AI that reads rate confirmation PDFs so dispatchers don't have to. A dispatcher — eventually an AI dispatcher — that covers nights and weekends so loads don't get missed. E-sign built in, not bolted on.

And priced at zero through 2026, because the goal was to prove the product worked before asking carriers to pay for it.

Two years in: did it work?

The Rate Con AI has a 95%+ accuracy rate on standard broker formats. ERETH ELD passed FMCSA's technical certification. Our AI dispatchers book real loads for real carriers after hours. The carrier dashboard still occasionally has a minor bug — we fix them the same day they're reported.

Would we have been better off just using an existing system and focusing on freight? Financially, in the short term, probably yes. But we would have kept paying $400 per truck per month for software that we knew was mediocre. And we would have missed the opportunity to build something that actually works the way the industry needs it to work.

We don't regret it.

← Back to Blog Next: Our first AI broker call →