← Back to Blog
Trucking News

Trucking News: October 12, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Trucking News: October 12, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Diesel Prices Remain the Biggest Threat to Carrier Margins

The trucking industry is not expecting President Trump’s diesel-related order to produce an immediate drop at the pump. The Louisiana Illuminator reports that carriers and industry observers remain skeptical because retail diesel prices are shaped by global crude markets, refinery capacity, distribution costs, taxes, and regional supply conditions—not federal direction alone.

For small carriers, the practical issue is timing. Even if the order eventually improves domestic fuel supply or reduces certain costs, operators still have to pay today’s price while waiting for those changes to reach the market. A carrier with weak fuel-surcharge language or too many empty miles can lose money before any policy benefit appears.

Review fuel surcharge tables, verify that they track the lanes you actually run, and compare fuel-card discounts instead of assuming one network is always cheapest. VAU0’s transportation management tools can also help carriers monitor fuel spending alongside miles, revenue, and load profitability.

The key takeaway: a federal fuel order may influence supply over time, but it does not replace disciplined fuel planning, accurate surcharges, and careful load selection.

Bankruptcies Put More Pressure on Small Fleets

Fox Business reports a string of trucking bankruptcy filings as diesel costs surge. Rising fuel is arriving alongside high repair bills, expensive insurance, elevated equipment payments, and uneven freight demand. Those pressures hit smaller fleets first because they have fewer trucks to spread fixed costs across and less access to cash when a customer pays slowly.

Bankruptcies can also create short-term disruption across the market. Trucks may leave service, freight can be reassigned, and used equipment may return to the market at distressed prices. That may eventually reduce capacity, but it does not help a carrier that is already operating below breakeven. A lower truck payment is not necessarily a good deal if the equipment needs major repairs or has an unclear maintenance history.

Owners should calculate a true cost per mile that includes fuel, maintenance reserves, insurance, permits, payroll, taxes, debt service, and downtime. Keep a rolling cash forecast for at least the next eight weeks, and communicate early with lenders, lessors, and major vendors if cash flow is tightening. Cutting necessary maintenance or accepting unprofitable freight usually postpones the problem rather than solving it.

Supreme Court Case Could Reshape the Carrier Landscape

Schneider expects a coming Supreme Court ruling to thin carrier ranks, according to Trucking Dive. The case could affect how carriers structure operations and manage regulatory or employment obligations. Large fleets may be better positioned to absorb legal changes because they have compliance departments, legal counsel, and capital to revise contracts and operating models.

Small carriers and owner-operators need to watch the decision closely without making changes based on headlines alone. A ruling can affect contractor arrangements, payroll exposure, insurance requirements, or the way freight is tendered. The actual impact will depend on the Court’s language, agency guidance, and how states and lower courts apply the decision.

Audit leases, independent-contractor agreements, dispatch practices, and business relationships now. Keep records showing who controls equipment, routes, schedules, payment terms, and safety decisions. Carriers should also use a reliable compliance process to track regulatory updates and obtain qualified legal advice before changing a contractor model.

Autonomous Trucks Receive a Five-Year Beacon Exemption

Tech Insider reports that self-driving trucks have received a five-year U.S. exemption from a beacon requirement. The change could reduce equipment and integration costs for autonomous operators, particularly during testing and early commercial deployments. It is another sign that federal regulators are trying to create a workable path for automated freight technology.

The near-term effect on conventional small carriers is likely limited. Most owner-operators will not suddenly face autonomous competition across every lane, but dedicated highway and distribution routes could gradually change as the technology expands. Fleets should also remember that a federal exemption may not eliminate state, local, terminal, insurance, or customer requirements.

Carriers should treat automation as a planning issue rather than an immediate replacement threat. Watch the lanes where large shippers are investing in autonomous operations, maintain strong service records, and consider whether better dispatch, tracking, and document automation can provide similar efficiency benefits without a major equipment investment.

FMCSA Prepares Hours-of-Service Flexibility Test

FMCSA has detailed upcoming rules for testing additional hours-of-service flexibility, Overdrive Magazine reports. A pilot or demonstration program can give regulators real-world data on whether limited flexibility improves utilization without increasing fatigue risk. The important details will be eligibility, documentation, participation limits, electronic logging requirements, and how safety performance is measured.

Carriers should not treat a proposed test as permission to change normal HOS practices. Until FMCSA publishes final requirements and a carrier is formally eligible, drivers must continue following current rules and ELD records must remain accurate. A flexibility program will likely require more documentation, not less, because regulators will need to compare fatigue and crash data against standard operations.

Prepare by reviewing HOS violation trends, roadside inspection results, driver schedules, and detention patterns. If a pilot becomes available, participation should be based on a clear safety and revenue case. VAU0’s compliance resources can help organize policies and records, but drivers and managers still need to verify the final FMCSA language before operating under any new option.

What carriers should do this week

  • Recalculate cost per mile using current diesel, repair, insurance, and financing costs.
  • Check that fuel surcharges, accessorials, and detention terms cover actual operating conditions.
  • Review cash flow for the next eight weeks and contact lenders or vendors before a missed payment.
  • Audit contractor agreements, dispatch records, and HOS documentation ahead of legal and regulatory changes.
  • Track autonomous-truck deployments and FMCSA pilot announcements, but do not change operating procedures until requirements are final.
← Back to Blog For Carriers →
Why We Built ESSE Instead of Buying Another TMS | ESSE Blog
Our Story

Why we built ESSE instead of buying another TMS

In 2022, we were running a small fleet and spending approximately $400 per truck per month on software. TMS license, ELD subscription, e-sign service, separate accounting integration. Four different logins. Four different monthly invoices. Four different support teams to call when something didn't work.

None of it talked to each other without manual data entry.

The software evaluation that changed everything

We spent three months evaluating every major TMS and fleet management system on the market. AscendTMS, McLeod, Motive, EZLogz, KeepTruckin, TruckingOffice, Axon. We signed up for demos, trials, and in two cases, paid for actual subscriptions to test them properly.

What we found was consistent across almost all of them: the software was built by people who had never dispatched a truck. You could tell immediately. The terminology was slightly wrong. The workflows assumed steps that no real dispatcher would take. The ELD and TMS were always separate systems that "integrated" — meaning they sometimes shared data, if you configured things correctly, and the configuration broke whenever either vendor pushed an update.

"The best way to evaluate trucking software is to use it under real pressure. Not in a demo. Not in a test environment. On a real load, with a real deadline, when a broker is calling every 30 minutes for an update."

The specific things that were broken

Without naming specific vendors: one major TMS required five screen transitions to update a load status. Not five clicks — five full page navigations. On a mobile browser from a truck stop, that meant 45 seconds to tell a broker the truck was loaded. Another system had beautiful analytics dashboards but couldn't tell you, in real time, how many hours of drive time your driver had remaining without navigating to a separate compliance module.

The ELD market was worse. Most ELD systems were designed to satisfy FMCSA's technical requirements — which they did — while making the user experience as painful as possible. Drivers hated them. When drivers hate their tools, they find workarounds. Workarounds create compliance risk.

The moment we decided to build

The decision was made on a Tuesday afternoon when our dispatcher spent 40 minutes re-entering data from a rate confirmation PDF that our ELD had already captured in a different system. The information existed. It was digital. It lived in three different places that didn't talk to each other, and a human was manually transferring it between systems.

That's not a technology problem. That's a lack of ambition problem. Nobody had decided to solve it because the existing systems were profitable enough without solving it.

What we decided to build instead

One platform. ELD and TMS as the same system, not integrations. AI that reads rate confirmation PDFs so dispatchers don't have to. A dispatcher — eventually an AI dispatcher — that covers nights and weekends so loads don't get missed. E-sign built in, not bolted on.

And priced at zero through 2026, because the goal was to prove the product worked before asking carriers to pay for it.

Two years in: did it work?

The Rate Con AI has a 95%+ accuracy rate on standard broker formats. ERETH ELD passed FMCSA's technical certification. Our AI dispatchers book real loads for real carriers after hours. The carrier dashboard still occasionally has a minor bug — we fix them the same day they're reported.

Would we have been better off just using an existing system and focusing on freight? Financially, in the short term, probably yes. But we would have kept paying $400 per truck per month for software that we knew was mediocre. And we would have missed the opportunity to build something that actually works the way the industry needs it to work.

We don't regret it.

← Back to Blog Next: Our first AI broker call →