← Back to Blog
Trucking News

Trucking News: October 16, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Trucking News: October 16, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Today’s trucking news points to a familiar challenge for small carriers: policy changes are moving quickly, but the cost and responsibility of adapting still fall heavily on fleet owners and drivers. Leadership changes at the American Trucking Associations, new research on driver health, pre-election lobbying, English-proficiency enforcement, and autonomous-truck technology all deserve attention.

ATA Names Mark Colson as Next President and CEO

The American Trucking Associations has named Mark Colson as its next president and CEO. The change comes at an important time for the industry, with carriers facing pressure from insurance costs, workforce shortages, federal safety policy, emissions rules, infrastructure needs, and uneven freight demand.

For small carriers, the practical question is what priorities ATA will push in Washington and how effectively those priorities reach lawmakers. A national trade association can help shape policy, but owner-operators and smaller fleets should still track rulemakings directly and maintain their own compliance processes. Changes involving hours of service, driver qualification, equipment standards, or enforcement can affect a two-truck operation just as much as a national fleet. Keeping records organized through a reliable compliance program remains essential, regardless of who leads the association.

Leadership matters, but the biggest advantage for a small carrier is knowing how a policy change affects daily operations before it becomes an enforcement problem.

ATRI Surveys Examine the Effects of Truck Driver Health

The American Transportation Research Institute has launched industry surveys focused on the impact of truck driver health. The effort is expected to gather information about health conditions, access to care, workplace pressures, and how medical concerns affect safety and retention.

Driver health is not just a personal issue; it affects preventable crashes, turnover, absenteeism, medical certification, and insurance exposure. Small carriers may not have a full-time safety or human-resources department, so health programs need to be practical. That can include better scheduling, realistic appointment windows, access to healthy food and exercise opportunities, and a process for drivers to report fatigue or medical concerns without fear of retaliation. Carriers should encourage drivers to participate in legitimate industry research while protecting private medical information and avoiding informal medical advice.

Owner-operators should also treat routine health maintenance as part of business continuity. A missed medical certification deadline or an untreated condition can take a truck out of service as quickly as a mechanical failure. Fleets can use their safety meetings and onboarding process to reinforce sleep, medication awareness, nutrition, and fatigue reporting.

Trucking Groups Seek Congressional Support Before the Midterms

Trucking organizations are seeking congressional support ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Industry groups typically use this period to press candidates and lawmakers on infrastructure spending, workforce development, trucking regulations, tax policy, parking, and the cost of operating commercial vehicles.

Political messaging can be broad, but carriers should focus on the issues that affect their lanes and equipment. Truck parking shortages, bridge conditions, tolls, fuel costs, insurance, and the availability of qualified drivers can have a measurable impact on margins. A small carrier does not need a large government-relations budget to participate. Contacting elected officials, joining a state trucking association, and sharing specific operational examples can be more useful than repeating general talking points.

Carriers should also avoid making business plans around campaign promises. Election-year proposals can change, stall, or become tied to unrelated legislation. Track final rules and enacted laws, then update pricing, contracts, and operating procedures accordingly. A transportation management system such as VAU0’s TMS resources can help carriers organize loads, costs, and customer information while policy changes develop.

Industry Group Pushes FMCSA on Stronger English-Proficiency Rules

A trucking group is urging the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration to adopt stronger English-proficiency rules for commercial motor vehicle drivers. The issue centers on whether drivers can understand highway signs, communicate with enforcement officers, respond to questions, and follow safety-related instructions.

For carriers, this is an area where documentation and consistent hiring practices matter. Companies should make sure driver qualification procedures include a lawful, job-related evaluation of communication ability and that dispatchers understand what drivers must be able to do during inspections and roadside encounters. The goal should be safe communication, not arbitrary screening based on accent, nationality, or protected characteristics.

Because any FMCSA action would need to go through the federal rulemaking process, carriers should not assume a new requirement is already in effect. Watch official FMCSA announcements and review guidance with a qualified compliance professional. In the meantime, use clear written instructions, confirm that drivers understand route hazards and customer requirements, and document training. Those steps can reduce misunderstandings without waiting for a final rule.

Self-Driving Trucks Reportedly Receive Five-Year Beacon Exemption

A report says self-driving trucks have received a five-year U.S. exemption involving vehicle beacon requirements. Details and the precise scope of the exemption should be verified through official federal sources before carriers make equipment or investment decisions.

If confirmed, an exemption of that length could give autonomous-trucking developers more time to test vehicles and refine operating models. It would not mean autonomous trucks are immediately replacing conventional carriers. Deployment still depends on state laws, federal safety requirements, insurance, customer acceptance, terminal operations, and the ability to handle edge cases on real roads.

Small carriers should watch this technology without assuming they must buy into it. Autonomous systems may first affect predictable middle-mile freight, dedicated routes, and major distribution networks. That could change available lanes over time, but it may also create work in local delivery, terminal transfers, specialized freight, maintenance, remote assistance, and loads requiring human judgment. Keep technology decisions tied to actual customer demand and verified regulatory requirements, not headlines alone.

What carriers should do this week

  • Review compliance files, driver qualification records, medical certification tracking, and inspection documentation.
  • Ask drivers for practical feedback on fatigue, health access, parking, scheduling, and route safety.
  • Monitor FMCSA and state-agency updates on English-proficiency enforcement and other proposed rules.
  • Contact elected representatives with specific examples of how parking, infrastructure, insurance, or regulatory costs affect your operation.
  • Verify autonomous-truck and exemption claims through official sources before changing equipment plans or customer commitments.
← Back to Blog For Carriers →
Why We Built ESSE Instead of Buying Another TMS | ESSE Blog
Our Story

Why we built ESSE instead of buying another TMS

In 2022, we were running a small fleet and spending approximately $400 per truck per month on software. TMS license, ELD subscription, e-sign service, separate accounting integration. Four different logins. Four different monthly invoices. Four different support teams to call when something didn't work.

None of it talked to each other without manual data entry.

The software evaluation that changed everything

We spent three months evaluating every major TMS and fleet management system on the market. AscendTMS, McLeod, Motive, EZLogz, KeepTruckin, TruckingOffice, Axon. We signed up for demos, trials, and in two cases, paid for actual subscriptions to test them properly.

What we found was consistent across almost all of them: the software was built by people who had never dispatched a truck. You could tell immediately. The terminology was slightly wrong. The workflows assumed steps that no real dispatcher would take. The ELD and TMS were always separate systems that "integrated" — meaning they sometimes shared data, if you configured things correctly, and the configuration broke whenever either vendor pushed an update.

"The best way to evaluate trucking software is to use it under real pressure. Not in a demo. Not in a test environment. On a real load, with a real deadline, when a broker is calling every 30 minutes for an update."

The specific things that were broken

Without naming specific vendors: one major TMS required five screen transitions to update a load status. Not five clicks — five full page navigations. On a mobile browser from a truck stop, that meant 45 seconds to tell a broker the truck was loaded. Another system had beautiful analytics dashboards but couldn't tell you, in real time, how many hours of drive time your driver had remaining without navigating to a separate compliance module.

The ELD market was worse. Most ELD systems were designed to satisfy FMCSA's technical requirements — which they did — while making the user experience as painful as possible. Drivers hated them. When drivers hate their tools, they find workarounds. Workarounds create compliance risk.

The moment we decided to build

The decision was made on a Tuesday afternoon when our dispatcher spent 40 minutes re-entering data from a rate confirmation PDF that our ELD had already captured in a different system. The information existed. It was digital. It lived in three different places that didn't talk to each other, and a human was manually transferring it between systems.

That's not a technology problem. That's a lack of ambition problem. Nobody had decided to solve it because the existing systems were profitable enough without solving it.

What we decided to build instead

One platform. ELD and TMS as the same system, not integrations. AI that reads rate confirmation PDFs so dispatchers don't have to. A dispatcher — eventually an AI dispatcher — that covers nights and weekends so loads don't get missed. E-sign built in, not bolted on.

And priced at zero through 2026, because the goal was to prove the product worked before asking carriers to pay for it.

Two years in: did it work?

The Rate Con AI has a 95%+ accuracy rate on standard broker formats. ERETH ELD passed FMCSA's technical certification. Our AI dispatchers book real loads for real carriers after hours. The carrier dashboard still occasionally has a minor bug — we fix them the same day they're reported.

Would we have been better off just using an existing system and focusing on freight? Financially, in the short term, probably yes. But we would have kept paying $400 per truck per month for software that we knew was mediocre. And we would have missed the opportunity to build something that actually works the way the industry needs it to work.

We don't regret it.

← Back to Blog Next: Our first AI broker call →