← Back to Blog
Trucking News

Trucking News: October 21, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Trucking News: October 21, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

ATA Recognizes 12 Trucking Leaders for Service to the Industry

The American Trucking Associations recognized 12 trucking leaders for their service to the industry. The awards highlight the people who spend years working beyond their own fleets—on safety programs, state and national policy, driver advocacy, and the day-to-day work of keeping trucking represented in public discussions.

For small carriers, this matters because industry policy is often shaped by people who understand operating realities. Issues such as insurance costs, detention, parking, workforce development, and enforcement can look very different from the perspective of a small fleet. Owner-operators and carrier owners should pay attention to the associations and local groups that speak for them. Participation does not require a large staff; attending meetings, responding to policy alerts, and sharing operational data can help keep smaller carriers visible.

State Trucking Association Leaders Recognized for Years of Service

State trucking association leaders were also recognized for long-term service. These organizations remain an important connection between carriers and state agencies, particularly when rules involve permits, highway funding, weather restrictions, tolling, roadside inspections, and commercial driver licensing.

That state-level connection can be especially useful for smaller carriers that do not have government-relations departments. A state association may provide early notice of regulatory changes, training opportunities, and guidance during legislative sessions. Carriers should not wait until a new rule affects a route to find those resources. Building a relationship now can make it easier to get accurate answers when a state changes enforcement priorities or operating requirements.

ATA Honors Trucking’s Champions With 2026 Mike Russell Image Awards

The ATA’s 2026 Mike Russell Image Awards recognized organizations and individuals for communications work that presents trucking in a positive and credible way. The awards typically focus on efforts that show the industry’s role in supplying communities, supporting the economy, improving safety, and developing professional drivers.

Image work is not just a concern for large carriers. A small fleet’s reputation affects recruiting, shipper relationships, insurance discussions, and community support. Carriers should make sure their public-facing information matches the way they operate: accurate safety information, professional equipment photos, clear hiring details, and real examples of driver contributions. A consistent online presence can also help distinguish a legitimate carrier from unreliable operators when freight markets are crowded.

For carriers using technology to improve service, the message should remain practical rather than promotional. Showing how electronic inspections, dispatch visibility, maintenance tracking, or better communication helps drivers and customers is more effective than simply listing software features. VAU0’s TMS resources can help carriers think through how operational data supports both customer service and internal accountability.

Trucking Group Pushes FMCSA for Stronger English Proficiency Rules

A trucking group is urging the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration to adopt stronger English proficiency rules for commercial motor vehicle drivers. English-language requirements already exist for interstate commercial drivers, but enforcement and testing standards have been the subject of continuing debate. The issue generally centers on whether a driver can understand traffic signs, communicate with safety officials, respond to questions, and perform required duties without creating a safety risk.

Any change could affect recruiting, onboarding, driver qualification reviews, and roadside enforcement. Small carriers should avoid treating this as a paperwork-only issue. Hiring managers and dispatchers need a consistent process for evaluating communication ability without relying on informal assumptions or discriminatory shortcuts. Job-related testing, documented interview questions, and clear training records are more defensible than inconsistent judgments made from one conversation.

Carriers should monitor official FMCSA announcements before changing their policies. If a proposal advances, review the details with qualified compliance counsel and update onboarding procedures, driver files, and supervisor training. VAU0’s compliance resources can help organize recurring reviews, but they do not replace the final text of a regulation or official agency guidance.

For small carriers, the English-proficiency debate is a reminder that hiring standards must be both safety-focused and consistently documented. The safest approach is to prepare for clearer enforcement without making decisions based on rumor or appearance.

Self-Driving Trucks Reportedly Receive a Five-Year Beacon Exemption

A report says self-driving trucks have received a five-year exemption from a federal requirement involving vehicle beacons. The change could remove one equipment or design barrier for autonomous truck developers, but it does not mean autonomous vehicles are broadly cleared to operate without other federal, state, or local requirements.

Small carriers should separate the technology headline from the near-term operating impact. Autonomous deployments still depend on approved routes, state rules, safety oversight, maintenance procedures, insurance, emergency response plans, and shipper acceptance. A beacon exemption may help manufacturers standardize equipment, but it does not eliminate the need to understand how automated trucks interact with conventional traffic or how liability is assigned after an incident.

Carriers operating near autonomous pilot corridors should watch state transportation announcements and customer communications. There may eventually be opportunities in relay work, terminal transfers, remote assistance, maintenance, or specialized freight. For now, the practical step is to keep route planning and incident procedures current. A connected TMS can help record route restrictions, customer requirements, and operational exceptions in one place rather than relying on scattered messages.

What carriers should do this week

  • Review updates from your state trucking association, especially changes involving inspections, permits, tolls, weather restrictions, and commercial driver licensing.
  • Audit driver onboarding records and confirm that communication and safety qualification procedures are documented consistently.
  • Check your public-facing website and recruiting materials for accurate information about safety, equipment, pay practices, and driver support.
  • Monitor official FMCSA and state notices before changing English-proficiency, autonomous-vehicle, or other compliance policies.
  • Use your TMS and compliance workflow to track route restrictions, policy acknowledgments, maintenance items, and follow-up dates.
← Back to Blog For Carriers →
Why We Built ESSE Instead of Buying Another TMS | ESSE Blog
Our Story

Why we built ESSE instead of buying another TMS

In 2022, we were running a small fleet and spending approximately $400 per truck per month on software. TMS license, ELD subscription, e-sign service, separate accounting integration. Four different logins. Four different monthly invoices. Four different support teams to call when something didn't work.

None of it talked to each other without manual data entry.

The software evaluation that changed everything

We spent three months evaluating every major TMS and fleet management system on the market. AscendTMS, McLeod, Motive, EZLogz, KeepTruckin, TruckingOffice, Axon. We signed up for demos, trials, and in two cases, paid for actual subscriptions to test them properly.

What we found was consistent across almost all of them: the software was built by people who had never dispatched a truck. You could tell immediately. The terminology was slightly wrong. The workflows assumed steps that no real dispatcher would take. The ELD and TMS were always separate systems that "integrated" — meaning they sometimes shared data, if you configured things correctly, and the configuration broke whenever either vendor pushed an update.

"The best way to evaluate trucking software is to use it under real pressure. Not in a demo. Not in a test environment. On a real load, with a real deadline, when a broker is calling every 30 minutes for an update."

The specific things that were broken

Without naming specific vendors: one major TMS required five screen transitions to update a load status. Not five clicks — five full page navigations. On a mobile browser from a truck stop, that meant 45 seconds to tell a broker the truck was loaded. Another system had beautiful analytics dashboards but couldn't tell you, in real time, how many hours of drive time your driver had remaining without navigating to a separate compliance module.

The ELD market was worse. Most ELD systems were designed to satisfy FMCSA's technical requirements — which they did — while making the user experience as painful as possible. Drivers hated them. When drivers hate their tools, they find workarounds. Workarounds create compliance risk.

The moment we decided to build

The decision was made on a Tuesday afternoon when our dispatcher spent 40 minutes re-entering data from a rate confirmation PDF that our ELD had already captured in a different system. The information existed. It was digital. It lived in three different places that didn't talk to each other, and a human was manually transferring it between systems.

That's not a technology problem. That's a lack of ambition problem. Nobody had decided to solve it because the existing systems were profitable enough without solving it.

What we decided to build instead

One platform. ELD and TMS as the same system, not integrations. AI that reads rate confirmation PDFs so dispatchers don't have to. A dispatcher — eventually an AI dispatcher — that covers nights and weekends so loads don't get missed. E-sign built in, not bolted on.

And priced at zero through 2026, because the goal was to prove the product worked before asking carriers to pay for it.

Two years in: did it work?

The Rate Con AI has a 95%+ accuracy rate on standard broker formats. ERETH ELD passed FMCSA's technical certification. Our AI dispatchers book real loads for real carriers after hours. The carrier dashboard still occasionally has a minor bug — we fix them the same day they're reported.

Would we have been better off just using an existing system and focusing on freight? Financially, in the short term, probably yes. But we would have kept paying $400 per truck per month for software that we knew was mediocre. And we would have missed the opportunity to build something that actually works the way the industry needs it to work.

We don't regret it.

← Back to Blog Next: Our first AI broker call →